Unstable approach — ANA253

RJFF · 34L

2026-08-21 05:43 UTC· RJTT RJFF· B772

ANA253 was operating from RJTT to RJFF on 2026-08-21. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Fukuoka Airport (RJFF) on runway 34L at 05:43 UTC. Trace data at the event: 940 ft AGL, 149 kt GS. Approach stability score: 35/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 13 kt wind, 8 kt crosswind component, 9,994 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 34L
  • 940 ft AGL at event
  • 149 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 35/100
  • 13 kt wind
  • 8 kt crosswind component
  • 9,994 m visibility
  • RJFF 071230Z 36006KT 330V040 9999 FEW020 SCT060 BKN070 26/22 Q1005 NOSIG

Flight context

  • ANA253
  • B772
  • RJTT → RJFF
  • 2026-08-21 05:43 UTC
  • RJFF runway 34L

All events on this flight

Unstable approach 05:43:17 UTC · RJFF runway 34L · 940 ft AGL · 149 kt GS
Unstable approach 05:43:17 UTC · RJFF runway 34L · 940 ft AGL · 149 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· RJFF