Return to field — N876TM

KAVL · 17

2026-07-16 00:00 UTC· KAVL → KAVL· VECTOR COACHING AND CONSULTING LLC· SF50

▶ Replay 📊 Analyse

N876TM (Vector Coaching and Consulting) had departed KAVL on 2026-07-16. SkyMeter detected a return to field at Asheville Regional Airport (KAVL) on runway 17 at 00:00 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL309, turnaround area near Lincolnton, US. Approach stability score: 33/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 0 kt wind, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 17
  • 30924 ft AGL at event
  • 326 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 33/100
  • 0 kt wind
  • 0 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • KAVL 152254Z 19003KT 10SM CLR 28/23 A3021 RMK AO2 LTG DSNT NE SLP201 T02780228

Flight context

  • N876TM
  • Vector Coaching and Consulting
  • SF50
  • KAVL → KAVL
  • 2026-07-16 00:00 UTC
  • KAVL runway 17

All events on this flight

Return to field 00:00:08 UTC · KAVL runway 17 · 30,924 ft AGL · 326 kt GS
Unstable approach 00:53:46 UTC · KAVL runway 17 · 3,278 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Unstable approach 01:03:46 UTC · KAVL runway 17 · 3,271 ft AGL · 118 kt GS
Unstable approach 00:53:46 UTC · KAVL runway 17 · 3,278 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Unstable approach 01:03:46 UTC · KAVL runway 17 · 3,271 ft AGL · 118 kt GS
Unstable approach 00:53:46 UTC · KAVL runway 17 · 3,278 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Unstable approach 01:03:46 UTC · KAVL runway 17 · 3,271 ft AGL · 118 kt GS
Unstable approach 00:53:46 UTC · KAVL runway 17 · 3,278 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Unstable approach 01:03:46 UTC · KAVL runway 17 · 3,271 ft AGL · 118 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KAVL