Diversion — EJA653

KTPA · 01R

2026-08-14 19:16 UTC· KFHU → KTPA· NETJETS SALES INC, ARTMA LLC, KING GREGORY, KING LEIGH ANN, CARE· C68A

▶ Replay 📊 Analyse

EJA653 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KFHU to KAUS (Austin Bergstrom International Airport) on 2026-08-14. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Tampa International Airport (KTPA) on runway 01R at 19:16 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL436, turnaround area near Columbus, US. METAR at the time reported 0 kt wind, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • SECURITY6/4240 2026-03-08 08:00Z – 2026-11-01 07:00Z SFC–180 ft

    SAN ANGELO, TX, Sunday, March 8, 2026 through Sunday, November 1, 2026 Local

    View FAA NOTAM →
  • HAZARDS6/4962 2026-08-13 18:15Z – 2026-08-20 18:00Z SFC–2,000 ft

    YOUNGSPORT, TX, Thursday, August 13, 2026 through Thursday, August 20, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 01R
  • 0 ft AGL at event
  • 0 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • 0 kt wind
  • 0 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • KTPA 161953Z 02010G20KT 360V060 10SM SCT044 BKN250 33/22 A3010 RMK AO2 SLP193 T03280222

Flight context

  • EJA653
  • Netjets Sales
  • C68A
  • KFHU → KTPA
  • 2026-08-14 19:16 UTC
  • KTPA runway 01R

All events on this flight

Diversion 19:16:02 UTC · KTPA runway 01R · 0 ft AGL · 0 kt GS
Diversion 19:16:02 UTC · KTPA runway 19L · 18 ft AGL · 120 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KTPA