EJA395 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KMRY to KVNY (Van Nuys Airport) on 2026-08-14. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Metropolitan Oakland International Airport (KOAK) on runway 10L at 03:20 UTC. Peak altitude 10,407 ft, turnaround area near Morgan Hill, US. Approach stability score: 91/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 50% of approaches at this runway and represent the centerline of normal operations. METAR at the time reported 11 kt wind, 7 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • SECURITY6/3687 2026-08-13 23:00Z – 2026-08-17 01:00Z SFC–400 ft

    Monteray, CA, Thursday, August 13, 2026 through Sunday, August 16, 2026 Local

    View FAA NOTAM →
  • UAS PUBLIC GATHERING6/2850 2026-08-14 00:00Z – 2026-08-14 06:30Z SFC–400 ft

    Santa Clara, CA, Friday, August 14, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 10L
  • 6 ft AGL at event
  • 120 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 91/100
  • 11 kt wind
  • 7 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • KOAK 161953Z 25011KT 10SM FEW012 BKN017 18/13 A3001 RMK AO2 SLP160 T01780128

Flight context

  • EJA395
  • Netjets Sales
  • E55P
  • KMRY → KOAK
  • 2026-08-14 03:20 UTC
  • KOAK runway 10L

All events on this flight

Diversion 03:20:43 UTC · KOAK runway 10L · 6 ft AGL · 120 kt GS
Diversion 03:20:43 UTC · KOAK runway 28R · 0 ft AGL · 0 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KOAK