Unstable approach — N392GF

PAJN · 08

2026-08-27 06:33 UTC· PASI PAJN· EVERBANK NA· B350

N392GF (Everbank NA) was operating from PASI to PAJN on 2026-08-27. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Juneau International Airport (PAJN) on runway 08 at 06:33 UTC. Trace data at the event: 1021 ft AGL, 138 kt GS. Approach stability score: 58/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 4 kt wind, 4 kt crosswind component, 11,265 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 08
  • 1021 ft AGL at event
  • 138 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 58/100
  • 4 kt wind
  • 4 kt crosswind component
  • 11,265 m visibility
  • PAJN 162153Z 12017G25KT 7SM -RA FEW006 BKN030 OVC038 12/11 A3012 RMK AO2 PK WND 12027/2059 SLP202 P0000 T01170106 $

Flight context

  • N392GF
  • Everbank NA
  • B350
  • PASI → PAJN
  • 2026-08-27 06:33 UTC
  • PAJN runway 08

All events on this flight

Unstable approach 06:33:52 UTC · PAJN runway 08 · 1,021 ft AGL · 138 kt GS
Unstable approach 06:33:52 UTC · PAJN runway 08 · 1,021 ft AGL · 138 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· PAJN