Long landing rollout — VJA502

KMDW · 22L

2026-09-02 03:27 UTC· KADS → KMDW· BANK OF UTAH TRUSTEE· GL5T

▶ Replay 📊 Analyse

VJA502 (Bank of Utah) was operating from KADS to KMDW on 2026-09-02. SkyMeter detected a long landing rollout at Chicago Midway International Airport (KMDW) on runway 22L at 03:27 UTC. Trace data at the event: 620 ft AGL, 9 kt GS. Approach stability score: 62/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 7 kt wind, 1 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. A long landing rollout is detected when ground deceleration after touchdown is below the per-runway P10 envelope. It is an observational measure of rollout efficiency, not a runway-exit incident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • HAZARDS6/8103 2026-08-26 12:00Z – 2026-09-09 02:00Z SFC–4,000 ft

    21NM NW BROKEN BOW, OK, Wednesday, August 26, 2026 through Wednesday, September 9, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 22L
  • 620 ft AGL at event
  • 9 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 62/100
  • 7 kt wind
  • 1 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • KMDW 161853Z 04007KT 10SM FEW017 OVC021 23/18 A3029 RMK AO2 SLP250 T02330183 $

Flight context

  • VJA502
  • Bank of Utah
  • GL5T
  • KADS → KMDW
  • 2026-09-02 03:27 UTC
  • KMDW runway 22L

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KMDW