EmergencyDescent — N592MA

2026-08-05 14:55 UTC· KAPA → KBZN· CESSNA AIRCRAFT LEASING LLC· C560

▶ Replay 📊 Analyse

N592MA (Cessna Aircraft Leasing) was operating from KAPA to KBZN on 2026-08-05. SkyMeter detected a emergencydescent at 14:55 UTC. Trace data at the event: 33912 ft AGL, 296 kt GS. Approach stability score: 75/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 2 kt wind. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • HAZARDS6/0881 2026-08-02 13:00Z – 2026-08-16 03:00Z SFC–14,000 ft

    26NM SW PRICE, UT, Sunday, August 2, 2026 through Sunday, August 16, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →
  • HAZARDS6/1454 2026-08-03 22:43Z – 2026-08-05 14:00Z SFC–9,500 ft

    32NM SW BROADUS, MT, Monday, August 3, 2026 through Wednesday, August 5, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →
  • HAZARDS6/1471 2026-08-04 14:00Z – 2026-08-19 04:00Z SFC–9,500 ft

    33NM SW BROADUS, MT, Tuesday, August 4, 2026 through Wednesday, August 19, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • 33912 ft AGL at event
  • 296 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 75/100
  • 2 kt wind
  • 0 kt crosswind component

Flight context

  • N592MA
  • Cessna Aircraft Leasing
  • C560
  • KAPA → KBZN
  • 2026-08-05 14:55 UTC

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B