Long landing rollout — FDX1559
KTUL · 18L2026-09-01 07:56 UTC· KMEM → KTUL· FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP· B752
FDX1559 (Federal Express) was operating from KMEM to KTUL on 2026-09-01. SkyMeter detected a long landing rollout at Tulsa International Airport (KTUL) on runway 18L at 07:56 UTC. Trace data at the event: 643 ft AGL, 30 kt GS. Approach stability score: 74/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 8 kt wind, 2 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. A long landing rollout is detected when ground deceleration after touchdown is below the per-runway P10 envelope. It is an observational measure of rollout efficiency, not a runway-exit incident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- HAZARDS6/9590 2026-08-31 21:40Z – 2026-09-01 21:34Z SFC–2,000 ft
DRIGGS, AR, Monday, August 31, 2026 through Tuesday, September 1, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 18L
- 643 ft AGL at event
- 30 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 74/100
- 8 kt wind
- 2 kt crosswind component
- 16,093 m visibility
- KTUL 160553Z 17006KT 10SM FEW150 29/19 A3006 RMK AO2 SLP168 T02940189 10356 20294 403830267 51013
Flight context
- FDX1559
- Federal Express
- B752
- KMEM → KTUL
- 2026-09-01 07:56 UTC
- KTUL runway 18L
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data