Diversion — EJA115
KDTW · 04R2026-08-16 04:29 UTC· KBHM → KDTW· NETJETS SALES INC, BANK OF UTAH TRUSTEE, HAMMOND DANA A, DESERT · GL5T
EJA115 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KBHM to KDAL (Dallas Love Field) on 2026-08-16. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport (KDTW) on runway 04R at 04:29 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL478, turnaround area near Anderson County, US. Approach stability score: 68/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 3 kt wind, 1 kt crosswind component, 12,875 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- SECURITY6/0708 2026-08-01 00:01Z – 2027-08-01 23:59Z SFC–400 ft
Goodlettsville, TN, Saturday, August 1, 2026 through Sunday, August 1, 2027 UTC
View FAA NOTAM → - UAS PUBLIC GATHERING6/3173 2026-08-13 21:00Z – 2026-08-23 07:00Z SFC–400 ft
Lebanon, TN, Thursday, August 13, 2026 through Sunday, August 23, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 04R
- 636 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 68/100
- 3 kt wind
- 1 kt crosswind component
- 12,875 m visibility
- KDTW 162053Z 02005KT 8SM FEW009 OVC021 23/17 A3031 RMK AO2 SLP262 T02280172 53002
Flight context
- EJA115
- Netjets Sales
- GL5T
- KBHM → KDTW
- 2026-08-16 04:29 UTC
- KDTW runway 04R
All events on this flight
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data