Unstable approach — EJA709

EJA709 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KJAC to KJWN on 2026-09-03. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at John C Tune Airport (KJWN) on runway 02 at 21:51 UTC. Trace data at the event: 1584 ft AGL, 150 kt GS. Approach stability score: 45/100. Scores below 50 occur on under 10% of approaches at this runway and indicate the v2 scorer flagged the approach as highly anomalous (three or more gates exceeded the runway's P90 envelope simultaneously). METAR at the time reported 3 kt wind, 2 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

• SECURITY6/0708 2026-08-01 00:01Z – 2027-08-01 23:59Z SFC–400 ft

  Goodlettsville, TN, Saturday, August 1, 2026 through Sunday, August 1, 2027 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/7115 2026-08-22 23:30Z – 2026-09-04 03:00Z SFC–13,000 ft

  41NM E PRICE, UT, Saturday, August 22, 2026 through Friday, September 4, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/7463 2026-08-25 12:00Z – 2026-09-08 08:00Z SFC–16,500 ft

  1NM NE OURAY, CO, Tuesday, August 25, 2026 through Tuesday, September 8, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/8502 2026-08-27 14:00Z – 2026-09-09 03:00Z SFC–15,000 ft

  48NM NW TAOS, NM, Thursday, August 27, 2026 through Wednesday, September 9, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/8806 2026-08-28 15:04Z – 2026-09-12 03:00Z SFC–15,000 ft

  30NM W TAOS, NM, Friday, August 28, 2026 through Saturday, September 12, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/8869 2026-08-28 21:32Z – 2026-09-12 03:00Z SFC–10,000 ft

  18NM SW LOVELAND, CO, Friday, August 28, 2026 through Saturday, September 12, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/8870 2026-08-29 14:00Z – 2026-09-12 03:00Z SFC–15,000 ft

  30NM W TAOS, NM, Saturday, August 29, 2026 through Saturday, September 12, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/9396 2026-08-31 18:00Z – 2026-09-04 01:30Z SFC–14,000 ft

  Bailey, CO, Monday, August 31, 2026 through Friday, September 4, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/9645 2026-08-31 18:00Z – 2026-09-04 01:30Z SFC–14,000 ft

  BAILEY, CO, Monday, August 31, 2026 through Friday, September 4, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/9646 2026-08-31 18:00Z – 2026-09-04 01:30Z SFC–14,000 ft

  BAILEY, CO, Monday, August 31, 2026 through Friday, September 4, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• HAZARDS6/0800 2026-09-03 14:50Z – 2026-09-06 02:30Z SFC–14,000 ft

  BAILEY, CO, Thursday, September 3, 2026 through Sunday, September 6, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• AIR SHOWS/SPORTS6/9676 2026-09-03 18:30Z – 2026-09-03 20:30Z SFC–17,000 ft

  Branson, MO, Thursday, September 3, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• AIR SHOWS/SPORTS6/8715 2026-09-03 19:30Z – 2026-09-03 21:30Z SFC–17,000 ft

  Branson, MO, Thursday, September 3, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →
• UAS PUBLIC GATHERING6/8809 2026-09-03 21:00Z – 2026-09-05 04:30Z SFC–400 ft

  Chicago, IL, Thursday, September 3, 2026 through Saturday, September 5, 2026 UTC

  View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data