Unstable approach — N675RN

KBFL · 30R

2026-08-25 17:29 UTC· KVIS KBFL· LAKESIDE AVIATION LLC, WOODSIDE ROAD AVIATION LLC· BE20

N675RN (Lakeside Aviation) was operating from KVIS to KBFL on 2026-08-25. SkyMeter detected a low approach-stability score at Meadows Field (KBFL) on runway 30R at 17:29 UTC. Trace data at the event: 1607 ft AGL, 135 kt GS. Approach stability score: 60/100. Scores in this band occur on roughly 10-15% of approaches at this runway, with multiple gates outside the per-runway envelope. METAR at the time reported 4 kt wind, 3 kt crosswind component, 16,093 m visibility. The approach-stability score rates the final approach against stabilized-approach gates (glideslope, lateral deviation, descent rate, and IAS) at defined altitudes. A low score means one or more of those were outside the normal envelope for how the approach was flown. The score is graded by guidance type, so instrument approaches (ILS or an aligned straight-in) are held to the full gate set, while visual and pattern arrivals are surfaced only when the score is clearly low. The score is advisory and observational, a deviation measure, not an assertion of an accident. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 30R
  • 1607 ft AGL at event
  • 135 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 60/100
  • 4 kt wind
  • 3 kt crosswind component
  • 16,093 m visibility
  • KBFL 170454Z 35007KT 10SM CLR 22/11 A2993 RMK AO2 SLP130 T02170111

Flight context

  • N675RN
  • Lakeside Aviation
  • BE20
  • KVIS → KBFL
  • 2026-08-25 17:29 UTC
  • KBFL runway 30R

All events on this flight

Unstable approach 17:29:46 UTC · KBFL runway 30R · 1,607 ft AGL · 135 kt GS
Unstable approach 17:29:46 UTC · KBFL runway 30R · 1,607 ft AGL · 135 kt GS

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KBFL