Diversion — EJA525

KDZB · 17

2026-08-13 19:05 UTC· KDAL → KDZB· NETJETS SALES INC, BOZIE LLC, CONTI STREET PARTNERS LLC, SMITH D· C68A

▶ Replay 📊 Analyse

EJA525 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KDAL to KAUS (Austin Bergstrom International Airport) on 2026-08-13. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Horseshoe Bay Resort Airpark (KDZB) on runway 17 at 19:05 UTC. Peak cruise altitude FL191, turnaround area near Clifton, US. Approach stability score: 89/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 50% of approaches at this runway and represent the centerline of normal operations. METAR at the time reported 15 kt wind, 1 kt crosswind component, 11,265 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.

Active FAA TFR during this flight

Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)
  • HAZARDS6/4586 2026-08-12 21:50Z – 2026-08-13 21:50Z SFC–20 ft

    YOUNGSPORT, TX, Wednesday, August 12, 2026 through Thursday, August 13, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →
  • HAZARDS6/4962 2026-08-13 18:15Z – 2026-08-20 18:00Z SFC–2,000 ft

    YOUNGSPORT, TX, Thursday, August 13, 2026 through Thursday, August 20, 2026 UTC

    View FAA NOTAM →

SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.

Pilot review data

  • Runway 17
  • 1117 ft AGL at event
  • 120 kt ground speed
  • 0 fpm vertical
  • Approach stability 89/100
  • 15 kt wind
  • 1 kt crosswind component
  • 11,265 m visibility
  • METAR KDZB 160335Z AUTO 16008KT 7SM CLR 31/15 A3006 RMK AO2 T03050145

Flight context

  • EJA525
  • Netjets Sales
  • C68A
  • KDAL → KDZB
  • 2026-08-13 19:05 UTC
  • KDZB runway 17

Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data

SkyMeter · trace data observed via ADS-B· KDZB