Diversion — EJA559
KMDW · 04L2026-08-30 16:15 UTC· KSTP → KMDW· NETJETS SALES INC, AIRELIX LLC, THORPE ALLEN, ARR PROMOTIONS LLC· C68A
EJA559 (Netjets Sales) was operating from KSTP to KBZN (Gallatin Field) on 2026-08-30. SkyMeter detected a diversion to Chicago Midway International Airport (KMDW) on runway 04L at 16:15 UTC. Peak altitude 10,626 ft, turnaround area near Elroy, US. Approach stability score: 76/100. Scores in this band are observed on roughly 25% of approaches at this runway: one or more gates outside the per-runway tightest envelope, but still inside the typical operating range. METAR at the time reported 11 kt wind, 4 kt crosswind component, 9,656 m visibility. Detection algorithm and known limitations: see SkyMeter methodology.
Active FAA TFR during this flight
Source: FAA TFR archive (hourly snapshot)- UAS PUBLIC GATHERING6/7434 2026-08-28 13:00Z – 2026-08-30 16:00Z SFC–400 ft
Milwaukee, WI, Friday, August 28, 2026 through Sunday, August 30, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM → - AIR SHOWS/SPORTS6/7379 2026-08-29 18:00Z – 2026-08-30 22:00Z SFC–16,500 ft
Janesville, WI, Saturday, August 29, 2026 through Sunday, August 30, 2026 UTC
View FAA NOTAM →
SkyMeter cross-referenced this flight against FAA-published TFRs that were active during its window and within its geographic bounding box. Overlap doesn't necessarily mean violation — the aircraft may have been outside the TFR’s precise polygon or flying under air-traffic-control coordination.
Pilot review data
- Runway 04L
- 606 ft AGL at event
- 120 kt ground speed
- 0 fpm vertical
- Approach stability 76/100
- 11 kt wind
- 4 kt crosswind component
- 9,656 m visibility
- KMDW 162053Z 02007KT 6SM -RA BR OVC012 22/20 A3028 RMK AO2 RAB23 SLP247 P0000 60000 T02170200 58005 $
Flight context
- EJA559
- Netjets Sales
- C68A
- KSTP → KMDW
- 2026-08-30 16:15 UTC
- KMDW runway 04L
Automated analysis. Events shown on this page (such as go-around, unstable approach, or runway events) are heuristic classifications produced by algorithms from publicly broadcast ADS-B data. They are intended to surface flights of interest for further review — they are not findings of fact, and they do not determine pilot fault, regulatory compliance, or the cause of any occurrence. Coverage gaps and sensor noise can affect accuracy. Only the relevant civil aviation authority or accident investigation body can make official determinations. How we detect events · Dispute or correct this data